Abstract
El autor efectúa en este trabajo tres observaciones a la reflexión filosófica de Luis Eduardo Primero Rivas, profesor de la Universidad Pedagógica Nacional. Estas observaciones son: la equivalencia que el filósofo colombiano-mexicano lleva a cabo entre fetiche e ídolo -el autor defenderá que es preferible el término ídolo para el discurso moral-; critica la concepción de Primero en torno a las neuronas-intérpretes, que este último retoma de la Escuela de Santiago de Chile, y finalmente, critica la toma de postura por un pensamiento pos-cristiano de Primero, haciéndole ver que es teóricamente imposible.STOA is a biannual publication edited by the Institute of Philosophy of the Universidad Veracruzana, Tuxpan, No. 29, Frac. Veracruz, C.P. 91020, Xalapa, Ver., Tel. 8154285, http://www.uv.mx/filosofia. Responsible editor: Jesús Turiso Sebastián. Exclusive Use Rights Reservation No. 04-2008-121012511200-203, granted by the Copyright Reservation Directorate of the National Institute of Copyright of the Secretariat of Public Education, ISSN: 2007-1868. Responsible for the last modification of this issue: Jesús Turiso Sebastián, Tuxpan, No. 29, Frac. Veracruz, C.P. 91020, date of last modification August 5, 2011. Distribution and digital support by the Academic Software Development Department of the Universidad Veracruzana.
The opinions expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the position of the editor of the publication. Reproduction by any means of the texts published in this journal may be done as long as the source is cited, including the name of the author, the name and number of the journal, and its electronic address. For more information write to revistastoa@uv.mx.
Revista Stoa is a completely free publication, with no cost for processing or receiving articles and free access.
This work is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.