Abstract
Algunos filósofos dialeteístas, como Graham Priest, sostienen que la filosofía de Hegel puede ser esclarecida desde el punto de vista de la lógica paraconsistente. En este artículo se expone la lógica discusiva de Jaskowski, una lógica paraconsistente, para compararla con algunas ideas clave de Hegel. Se concluye que si bien la lógica de Jaskowski sí puede esclarecer algunos puntos obscuros de la filosofía de Hegel, no por ello se sigue que la lógica hegeliana sea paraconsistente.References
Albert, H. (1968). Traktak u¨ber kritische Vernunft. Mohr Siebeck. Brandom, R. (2002). Tales of Mighty Dead. Harvard University Press. Craig Rhodes, M. (2013). “On Contradiction in Orthodox Philosophy”. In
Logic in Orthodox Christian Thinking. Ontos Verlag.
Crites, S. (1998). Dialectic and Gospel in the Development of Hegel’s Thin- king. The Pennsylvania State University Press.
Da Costa, N. and Doria, F. A. (1995). “On Ja´skowski’s Discussive Logics”.
Studia Logica, 54(1).
Dom´ınguez Prieto, P. (1995). Indeterminaci´on y Verdad. La polivalencia l´ogica en la Escuela Lvov-Varsovia. Nossa y Jara.
Dummett, M. (1988). Truth and other Enigmas. Harvard University Press. Feser, E. (2014). Scholastic Metaphysics: A Contemporary Introduction. Edi-
tiones Scholasticae.
Florensky, P. (2006). Stoli i utverzhdinie ictini. ACT (En ruso). Hegel, G. (1986). Werke in 20 Banden. Suhrkamp.
Ho¨sle, V. (1987). Hegels System. Felix Meiner.
Houlgate, S. (2005). The Opening of Hegel’s Logic. Purdue University Press.
Iljin, I. (1946). Die Philosophie Hegels als Kontemplative Gotteslehre.
A.Francke Ag. Verlag.
Inwood, M. (1983). Hegel. London, Routledge.
Jaeschke, W. (1998). Hegel. La conciencia de la modernidad. Akal. Ja´skowsky, S. (1968). “Propositional Calculus for Contradictory Deductive
Systems”. Studia Logica, 24.
Kant, I. (2000). L´ogica. Akal.
Kotas, J. (1975). “Discussive Sentential Calculus of Ja´skowski”. Studia Logica, 34(2).
L´eonard, A. (1974). Commentaire Litt´eral de la Logique de Hegel. Vrin. Miranda, P. (1989). Hegel ten´ıa raz´on. Universidad Aut´onoma Metropolita-
na.
Oderberg, D. (2007). Real Essentialism. Routledge.
Pen˜a, L. (1991). Rudimentos de l´ogica matem´atica. Centro Superior de Investigaciones Científicas.
Pinkard, T. (1988). Hegel’s Dialectic. The Explanation of Possibility. Temple University Press.
Pinkard, T. (2000). Hegel. Una biograf´ıa. Acento.
Priest, G. (2002). Beyond the Limits of Thought. Oxford University Press. Priest, G. and Routley, R. (1984). On Paraconsistency. University of Western
Australia.
Reyes, P. (2016). “Principios lógicos propuestos por Duns Escoto”. In´edito. Rojas, M. (2002). Der Begriff des Logischen und die Notwendigkeit universell-
substantieller Vernunft. Wissenschaftsverlag.
Stace, W. (1955). The Philosophy of Hegel. Dover Publications.
Stern, R. (1990). Hegel Kant and the Structure of the Object. Routledge. Stern, R. (2012). Hegelian Metaphysics. Oxford University Press.
Urchs, M. (1995). Discursive logic towards a logic of rational discourse. Studia Logica, 54(2).
Van Fraassen, B. C. (1971). Formal Semantics and Logic. MacMillan. Wandschneider, D. (1995). Grundzuge einer Theorie der Dialektik. Klett-
Cotta.
Westphal, K. (1989). Hegel’s Epistemological Realism. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
STOA is a biannual publication edited by the Institute of Philosophy of the Universidad Veracruzana, Tuxpan, No. 29, Frac. Veracruz, C.P. 91020, Xalapa, Ver., Tel. 8154285, http://www.uv.mx/filosofia. Responsible editor: Jesús Turiso Sebastián. Exclusive Use Rights Reservation No. 04-2008-121012511200-203, granted by the Copyright Reservation Directorate of the National Institute of Copyright of the Secretariat of Public Education, ISSN: 2007-1868. Responsible for the last modification of this issue: Jesús Turiso Sebastián, Tuxpan, No. 29, Frac. Veracruz, C.P. 91020, date of last modification August 5, 2011. Distribution and digital support by the Academic Software Development Department of the Universidad Veracruzana.
The opinions expressed by the authors do not necessarily reflect the position of the editor of the publication. Reproduction by any means of the texts published in this journal may be done as long as the source is cited, including the name of the author, the name and number of the journal, and its electronic address. For more information write to revistastoa@uv.mx.
Revista Stoa is a completely free publication, with no cost for processing or receiving articles and free access.
This work is under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.